HOME        ARCHIVE        BIOS/PHOTOS        CARTOONS        PARTNERS        CONTACT US        SUBSCRIBE 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

WORD COUNT 692                                                                                                                DECEMBER 8, 2004

TIME FOR A BILATERAL LAKE SUPERIOR PEACE PARK –  by Joyce Braithwaite-Brickley 

In Lake Superior, the United States and Canada have a global wonder. The biggest lake in the world by surface area, big enough to hold the other four Great Lakes and then some, it is the cleanest of the bunch, the coldest, and in some ways the least damaged by accidents and greed. So why do both governments give Superior more lip service than protection? 

This fall marked the 13th anniversary of an agreement signed by the two countries, plus Ontario, Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin, to get the toxic chemicals out. Unfortunately, it also marked the 13th anniversary of promises that have led to plenty of meetings and reports, but precious little action. 

Back then, the governments were under pressure from citizens and a government panel, the International Joint Commission, to make Lake Superior a "demonstration zone” of how economic development could be accommodated without poisoning the environment. They accepted the challenge in a document signed in September 1991. Then they mostly dropped the ball. 

Yes, the agreement prompted a spirited discussion of the issues of economic growth and pollution in the Lake Superior Basin. And local agencies, like the Western Lake Superior Sanitary District in Duluth, made commendable efforts to reduce some of the nastiest toxins like mercury and PCBs. But when it came time for the governments actually to do something on a large scale -- like require all new industries sitting in the Basin to use non-toxic chemicals in their processes -- fears of job loss came first. On the tenth anniversary of the 1991 agreement, the Lake Superior Alliance, a citizens group, gave the overall government effort a "D." But it awarded an "A" for the number of documents produced in the effort, adding, "While there is no denying their usefulness as a repository of information, there have been other suggested uses, including improving traction in older, rear-wheel-drive pickup trucks." 

To her credit, in her 2002 campaign for governor, Michigan's Jennifer Granholm proposed reviving the state's participation in the Lake Superior protection effort, saying she wanted to "protect Lake Superior from toxic chemicals, to protect special places in the Lake Superior Basin, and to attract environmentally sustainable business to the Basin." Now it's time for her to challenge the governors of Wisconsin and Minnesota, and Premier Dalton McGuinty of Ontario, to get the ball rolling again. But why be limited by unsuccessful visions of the past? Perhaps the Lake Superior governments could excite their people, in this time of international conflict, with a new vision -- the world's first international aquatic Peace Park. 

It's not as outlandish as it might sound. More than 70 years ago, Waterton Lakes National Park in Alberta and Glacier National Park in Montana were linked together in one of the world's first international peace parks. According to the United Nations Environmental Program, the peace park idea was the brainchild of outdoorsmen who considered the association of the two national parks as the basis of a natural wildlife reserve spanning international differences. The park "reflects the peace and goodwill between Canada, the United States, and the Blackfoot Confederacy," says the United Nations. 

Our understanding of parks has changed since this international peace park was formed in 1932. The United States has several underwater parks. Ninety-five percent of Florida's Biscayne National Park's 180,000 acres are underwater, Lake Huron's Fathom Five Marine National Park, at the mouth of Georgian Bay and administered by the Canadian government, is also largely underwater. If we ever thought of parks as preventing use or economic development, that model has long since died. Parks are often economic sparkplugs, in fact, attracting tourists and the industries that depend on them. 

Maybe it's time we thought bigger here in the Great Lakes Basin. By designating Lake Superior an International Peace Park, we can not only reinforce the tradition of friendship between the United States and Canada, but also advance understanding of the lake as one of the world's largest reservoirs of freshwater, and a museum of unique fish and geology that is worth protecting for all time. 

It's worth a try -- and better than another unproductive government task force. 

-- 

Joyce Braithwaite-Brickley was assistant to the Michigan Republican Party chairman and political advisor and campaign manager for former Gov. William G. Milliken. Her essays have appeared widely in the state. priorities@charter.net -- A photo of Joyce Braithwaite-Brickley is available CLICK HERE 

 # # # # # #

EDITORS NOTE: MinutemanMedia.org is seeking, after all these years, to become a bit higher profile. For this reason we would be grateful if you would credit us with any piece you may use: "Distributed by MinutemanMedia.org." (or similar).